Flight or Fight: The FAA's unjust Crusade Against Veteran Airmen and The Punitive Paradox of VA Disability

In the intricate realm of aviation regulation, a distressing narrative unfolds, involving 5,000 plus veteran airmen and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). This story highlights a system marred by controversy, particularly around the handling of VA disability disclosures, mental health, and the harsh punitive measures imposed on veterans who have served our nation.

The Injustice of Revocation and its Redundancy The FAA's decision to revoke the pilot certificates of numerous veterans under the pretext of safety concerns has been met with intense criticism. This action is not merely procedural; it represents a significant setback, professionally and personally, for the affected veterans. The process to regain these certificates is daunting and financially burdensome, adding to the anguish of those already suffering from the consequences of their service.

Crucially, this revocation often proves redundant. Pilots, by regulation, cannot operate an aircraft without a valid FAA medical certificate, rendering the additional step of revoking their pilot licenses unnecessary and overly punitive. This approach raises serious questions about the FAA's intentions and the effectiveness of such measures in enhancing aviation safety.

 

military

image provide by Shannon Cruz

Privacy Invasion and Discrimination Against Veterans The FAA's access to and utilization of VA medical records for these investigations have sparked significant concerns about privacy invasion and targeted discrimination. This practice has led to disproportionate scrutiny of veterans, leading to outcomes that seem unjust and discriminatory. The ease with which the FAA accesses these private records highlights a glaring lack of equitable treatment for veteran pilots.

Mental Health: The FAA’s Contrary Stance Despite insights from the NTSB Mental Health in Aviation Summit, where Chair Jennifer Homendy emphasized the need for supportive approaches towards mental health in aviation, the FAA's actions suggest a contrary stance. The current system, as pointed out by Homendy, might incentivize pilots to hide their mental health needs or avoid seeking help, a situation detrimental to pilots' well-being and a potential risk to aviation safety.

The Punitive Nature of Disclosing Mental Health Issues For veteran pilots grappling with PTSD and other mental health issues, the requirement to disclose such conditions to the FAA, coupled with the fear of punitive actions like the revocation of pilot certificates, creates a punishing paradox. This situation places veterans in a vulnerable position, where they are penalized for being honest about their mental health status. The FAA's approach, targeting veterans based on their VA disability ratings, has led to allegations of discrimination and a lack of fairness.

Conclusion: A Call for Systemic Reform This confluence of issues demands an urgent call for reform within the FAA. Policies must be realigned to balance safety with fairness and respect for the unique challenges faced by veteran pilots. The current approach, disproportionately targeting veterans and overlooking the nuances of individual cases, calls for a thorough overhaul. The FAA needs to adopt a more empathetic, transparent, and fair approach in dealing with veteran airmen, ensuring that the principles of fairness, dignity, and respect are upheld. The aviation community and the public must advocate for a more just and equitable system that honors the service and sacrifices of our military veterans.

Written by: Shannon Cruz

veteran pilot